Google Announces Pixel 4a - A $349 Value
by Andrei Frumusanu on August 3, 2020 11:30 AM EST- Posted in
- Mobile
- Smartphones
- Pixel 4a
Today Google is announcing its 2020 successor to its budget/mid-range line of phones in the form of the new Pixel 4a. Awaited since several months now, but seemingly delayed into August, the new Pixel 4a brings to the table a few key upgrades whilst offering a Google software experience at a $349 price point.
Last year’s Pixel 3a and Pixel 3a XL were seemingly well received devices, with Google’s strategy being mostly focused on offering a “Google Experience” software stack that’s only found on Pixel devices. This year, Google is trying to continue this focus with the Pixel 4a, with the biggest obvious change being that we’re not seeing a 4a XL being released at this point in time.
Google Pixel 4a | ||
Pixel 4a | ||
SoC | Snapdragon 730G 2x Kryo 470 (CA76) @ 2.2GHz 6x Kryo 470 (CA55) @ 1.8GHz Adreno 618 |
|
DRAM | 6GB LPDDR4X | |
Display | 5.81" OLED 2340 x 1080 (19.5:9) |
|
Size | Height | 144.0 mm |
Width | 69.4 mm | |
Depth | 8.2 mm | |
Weight | 143 grams | |
Battery Capacity | 3140mAh | |
Wireless Charging | - | |
Rear Cameras | ||
Main | 12.2MP 1.4µm Dual Pixel PDAF f/1.7 77° lens with OIS |
|
Telephoto | - | |
Wide | - | |
Extra | - | |
Front Camera | 8MP 1.12µm f/2.0 84° lens; fixed focus |
|
Storage | 128GB UFS 2.1 | |
I/O | USB-C 3.5mm headphone jack |
|
Wireless (local) | 802.11ac Wave 2 Wi-Fi Bluetooth 5.1 LE + NFC |
|
Cellular | Snapdragon X15 LTE (Category 12/5) DL = 600Mbps 3x20MHz CA, 256-QAM UL = 150Mbps 2x20MHz CA, 64-QAM |
|
Other Features | Dual Speakers, 18W Fast Charging | |
Dual-SIM | 1x nanoSIM + eSIM | |
Launch Price | $349 / 349£ / 349€ |
Hardware-wise, the Pixel 4a is being powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SoC, a chip platform that’s nearly 1.5 years old by now. The SoC features two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8GHz, accompanied by an Adreno 618 GPU.
Whilst certainly not a bad SoC in itself and is well fitting for a device of this price range, the fact that Google had opted to release a 4G device at this point in time, and versus new the competition such as 399€ Snapdragon 765 phones like the OnePlus Nord puts the Pixel 4a at a rough spot in terms of long-term value proposition. We’re currently at an inflection point between standards in the smartphone industry, so it’s definitely something I would consider if you’re planning to keep a device for more than a year.
Memory wise, Google has configured the Pixel 4a competitively as it features 6GB of RAM and 128GB of storage.
One of the best aspects of the Pixel 3a phones were that they feature OLED displays, and the 4a continues the trend for the higher-quality display technology even though the phones are at the lower price range. The screen diagonal has risen to 5.81”, however that’s only because the aspect ratio has been increased to 19.5:9 thanks to the move to a full-screen display design.
The 2340 x 1080 resolution screen now features a hole-punch front-camera located in the left corner of the notification area, actually representing Google’s most modern design aesthetic to date in this regard.
The phone has a similar form-factor as the Pixel 3a, actually shrinking in length from 151.3 to 144mm. The width which most notably is the defining factor into one-hand usability of a phone has remained similar at 69.4mm – which is actually on the smaller size compared to most other devices on the market right now.
The small size does have one disadvantage, and that’s the battery size which falls in at 3140mAh which isn’t all that competitive in the current landscape. The only silver lining here is that the phone weighs in at only 143g which makes it very lightweight, a lot having to do with the plastic housing of the phone that is actually quite uncommon to find in a phone nowadays.
The phone features up to 18W PD charging capability, however wireless charging was one of the features on the chopping block in order to achieve the lower price-point.
In terms of camera experience, it’s pretty straightforward for the Pixel 4a: It houses the very same module that is found on the Pixel 4. This means it’s again the same 12.2MP sensor coupled with a f/1.7 optical system at a conventional viewing angle of 77° which corresponds to a 27mm equivalent focal length.
The good news for the Pixel 4a is that at this price range, the phone should have an easy time to compete with most other phones as the camera is still amongst the best performers on the market. Whilst the main module is seemingly going to offer a great experience and will certainly be able to compete and probably outperforms phones such as the iPhone SE, it’s still only a single camera module setup – which is going to be again quite weird given that most other vendors at least have two usable camera modules, most of them opting for an ultra-wide-angle.
The front-camera also sees the adoption of the very same 8MP f/2.0 module that is found on the Pixel 4.
In essence, the camera performance of the Pixel 4a should be in line with the Pixel 4, for which you can read our comprehensive comparison in context of all other flagship devices in 2020.
Other notable mentions of the Pixel 4a is the fact that it continues to use a rear capacitive fingerprint reader, and luckily still maintains a 3.5mm headphone jack that’s no longer present on the higher-end Pixel phones.
A Lower Price at $349
The Pixel 4a comes at $349 which is $50 less than the launch price of the Pixel 3a last year. What we’re getting this year are a more notably updated processor, more RAM, double the default storage which has been upgraded to UFS 2.1, and a new design including a new screen with longer aspect ratio. Whilst the camera department has seen the adoption of the new modules from the Pixel 4, these weren’t that big of a jump over the Pixel 3 and 3a – and Google still keeps things very simplistic with only a single rear camera.
Overall, it feels like it’s a solid package, at least it feels a quite better value proposition than what the Pixel 3a was last year. However, Google’s only real strength here is the camera processing; a $50 more expensive OnePlus Nord offers a faster SoC with future-proof 5G connectivity, a 90Hz screen, and throws in the extra ultra-wide-angle camera, even though it’s possibly not great in quality.
It should be noted that the Pixel 4a has a petite stature, and the lack of a Pixel 4a XL means that if you’re looking for a small phone, the 4a is amongst only a few other rare offerings on the market right now.
I see Google having a tough time against the mid-range competition in global markets, the fact that there’s almost no other comparable device offering in the US makes the Pixel 4a a seemingly no-brainer choice at this price segment, with the phone offering a magnitude better value than the flagship Pixel 4 line-up.
Availability for the Pixel 4a starts August 20th in the US, with later release dates in other markets such as October 1st for the UK, and late-to-mid September for other European markets.
Google also made a teaser mention that we’ll be seeing a 5G variant of the Pixel 4a later this year at a price point of $499, which if the only upgrades are a 5G compatible SoC, will be quite uncompetitive in pricing.
Related Reading:
- Google Teases Pixel 4a (5G) and Pixel 5 Later This Year
- The Google Pixel 4 XL Review: Stuck In The Past In 2019
- The Google Pixel 3a XL Review: Does Mid-Range Make Sense?
- Mobile Flagship Phone Camera Overview 2020 H1: Still Picture Battle
- Google Announces Pixel 3a & Pixel 3a XL: Mid-Range Phones With Flagship Camera
- The Google Pixel 3 Review: The Ultimate Camera Test
- OnePlus Announces Nord - Snapdragon 765 at 399€
153 Comments
View All Comments
Alistair - Monday, August 3, 2020 - link
biggest problem is non-US pricing (we'll see carrier support later) and the free LG G7's and Galaxy S9's on contract out there$479 in Canada
Flunk - Monday, August 3, 2020 - link
Disappointing this doesn't have a Snapdraogn 765. This is essentially already a phone from mid last year.eek2121 - Monday, August 3, 2020 - link
The Pixel 5 will likely have the 765g. Out of genuine curiosity, what workload on your phone do you need that requires a faster SoC? Most of the time when a smartphone has performance issues, it can be traced down to a specific cause and the issue is almost never the lack of CPU resources or RAM.Peskarik - Monday, August 3, 2020 - link
probably protein folding running 24/7, or bitcoin mining.FunBunny2 - Monday, August 3, 2020 - link
"bitcoin mining""Is that your sword or are you just glad to see me?"
Alistair - Monday, August 3, 2020 - link
slow CPU means you need to upgrade sooner, the entire reason I'm interested in this phone is my sister's old phone is too slow (LG G4)Peskarik - Tuesday, August 4, 2020 - link
the only reason I would upgrade my Pixel XL is battery degradation. I do not even care about software updates and so called security updates, my phone is working just fine as it is. The 821 QUalcomm platform in it is perfectly fine, I have no stuttering etc. I watch videos, take photos, play a racing game, it copes perfectly fine and does not get hot like some of these CPU monsters. People upgrade mostly for upgrade's sake, nothing to do with hardware inside. Afterwards they invent reasons why they could not live without 865 or 120Hz or 12GB Ram etc.Spunjji - Wednesday, August 5, 2020 - link
The CPU portion of the SoC is indeed more than sufficient, but they cheap out in other areas that do indeed affect user experience. The Snapdragon 821 has double the memory channels and double the GPU shader resources of the 730. Even accounting for efficiency improvements, the 730 still comes in at a deficit. You have to go back to 2015 to find a high-end Qualcomm SoC that has inferior GPU performance to the 730, and you will probably notice the effects of that on UI performance before the end of the phone's service life.Peskarik - Wednesday, August 5, 2020 - link
Thanks for the info!cknobman - Monday, August 3, 2020 - link
Get tired of seeing the reference to the OnePlus Nord.The only place in the world it can be had for $399 is pretty much India. Everywhere else its considerably more expensive.
Not to mention we cannot get it in the United States. So talking about it as a competitor is not accurate.